There are numerous theories regarding individual motivation. The main that impact most employees are known as “person as machine” and “person as scientist.” “Person as machine” means that individuals exhibit certain behaviors as a matter of routine and that they do not even think about the actions that they are doing. This type of individual is motivated by his or her own needs and by the environment they are working within. “Person as scientist” looks at individuals as researchers who are continually seeking more knowledge and further understanding. Within the “person as scientist” approach, the individual makes decisions with more precision and thought. The main difference between the two approaches is that the scientist metaphor is typically seen as an “active information gatherer,” while the machine metaphor is typically seen as more of a passive respondent. Workplaces are rapidly evolving, including within the field of online education, and therefore the way motivation is regarded is changing as well.
The main approach that most online educators fall under is the “person as scientist.” Working in a university setting, I’m surrounded by well-educated individuals who are constantly looking to improve their own knowledge, as well as make the university better as a whole for our students. Instructors are known for being research oriented and no matter what is being discussed at a meeting, there is always at least one individual who is trying to improve upon the idea and make it bigger and better.
There are some negatives to this approach as well. The most prevalent one that I have noticed occurs when individuals disagree regarding the best way to approach a situation, develop an assessment, deal with student issues, or other issues that arise. Because everyone is well educated it can be difficult to see other’s points of view. Often, employees tend to become fixated on one solution without giving all of the ideas a fair chance. I think this is mostly due to the perception of being thinkers and ultimately passionately believing that their way is the correct way.
Within my university, I think there is a solid structure for motivation. Work-life balance is typically not an issue and full-time employees are typically able to work from home and have some flexibility regarding their work hours. These are positive motivators. Offering more vacation days and opportunities to participate in professional development could increase motivation. Instructors have some control over their workday, but there are rigorous deadlines and requirements as well. Giving instructors more control over curriculum and curriculum changes would also increase motivation.
It is important to note that commitment and motivation go hand in hand with behavior. Schools need to recognize the value of commitment to the organization, which in turn impacts behavior and motivation of employees. By building trust and overall commitment, this can lead to a positive impact on motivation as a whole for online instructors.
About the Author
Jamie Weitl is a WAHM teaching for several online universities and raising three precocious little ones. In her spare time she enjoys writing, baking, and running. For more info, see my Google Plus Profile.
